A domestic violence finding does not stay in the criminal court — it can reshape a child-custody case.
Under Family Code 3044, a recent DV finding creates a rebuttable presumption against awarding custody to the person found responsible.
The Family Code 3044 Presumption
California Family Code 3044 creates a rebuttable presumption that awarding sole or joint physical or legal custody to a parent who has committed domestic violence within the previous five years is not in the child’s best interest. It can be overcome, but it puts the burden on the accused parent — a serious shift in a custody dispute.
Why the Cases Are Linked
The criminal DV case and the family-law case run on separate tracks, but they feed each other. A criminal conviction — or even findings from a restraining-order proceeding — can trigger the 3044 presumption. That is one more reason the outcome of the criminal case matters far beyond the courtroom.
Protecting Your Rights
Because custody is on the line, the criminal defense strategy has to account for the family-law consequences. Avoiding a DV conviction, or resolving the case in a way that does not establish a qualifying finding, can protect your relationship with your children. Coordinate your criminal and family-law strategy, and raise custody with your defense lawyer early.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does domestic violence affect child custody in California?
Under Family Code 3044, a finding that a parent committed domestic violence within the previous five years creates a rebuttable presumption that giving that parent custody is not in the child's best interest. It can be overcome, but it shifts the burden onto the accused parent.
Are the criminal case and the custody case connected?
They run on separate tracks but feed each other. A criminal domestic violence conviction — or findings from a restraining-order proceeding — can trigger the Family Code 3044 custody presumption, which is why the criminal outcome matters far beyond the criminal court.
How do I protect my custody rights in a DV case?
By building a criminal defense strategy that accounts for the family-law consequences — avoiding a DV conviction or a qualifying finding where possible — and coordinating your criminal and family-law strategy. Raise custody with your defense lawyer early.
GuidesComplete Guide to California Misdemeanors · Glossary · Penalties Reference.
Free 30-Minute Consultation
A DV case can reshape your custody rights. Tell me what's happening and I'll tell you what to protect.
Schedule Free ConsultationAbout the Author
Ahmed S. Hasan
San Francisco Criminal Defense Attorney · State Bar of California #364992
Ahmed S. Hasan is the founder of ASH Legal, a solo criminal defense practice based in San Francisco. The firm runs on flat-fee representation: one lawyer, one fee, from arraignment through resolution. No hourly billing. No surprise invoices.
Ahmed is a graduate of Emory University School of Law and a member in good standing of the State Bar of California (Bar #364992). His practice focuses on San Francisco misdemeanor defense — DUI, domestic violence, petty theft and shoplifting, drug possession, vandalism, trespassing, and assault and battery — with particular attention to diversion-track outcomes that end in dismissal under PC 1001.95, PC 1001.36 (Mental Health Diversion), PC 1001.80 (Military Diversion), and PC 1001.83 (Parental Caregiver Diversion).
Ahmed previously served as a post-bar clerk with the San Francisco Public Defender's Office, the city's largest indigent-defense practice. He is a member of the Asian Pacific American Bar Association of Silicon Valley.
He represents clients at the San Francisco Hall of Justice (850 Bryant Street) and the Civic Center Courthouse. The ASH Legal office is at 15 Boardman Place, Suite 301, San Francisco, CA 94103.
Free 30-minute consultations are available by phone or Zoom. (510) 545-6515 · ahmed@ashlegal.com