One statute. Most misdemeanors. No guilty plea. Case dismissed at the end. Arrest sealed.
That is Penal Code 1001.95 — California's judicial misdemeanor diversion law — in one breath. It is the broadest second-chance mechanism the criminal-justice code has produced this decade. And in San Francisco, the bench uses it.
What PC 1001.95 Actually Does
Effective January 1, 2021, PC 1001.95 gives any San Francisco superior court judge the authority to divert most misdemeanor cases. The mechanics are simple. The case is paused. The defendant completes a set of conditions over up to two years. At the end — if the conditions are met — the case is dismissed.
No conviction. No guilty plea ever entered. No criminal record.
The judge writes the conditions. The judge controls the pace. The judge decides whether the case is appropriate. The District Attorney does not have a veto. That single feature is what makes 1001.95 different from anything that came before it.
Who Qualifies — The Eligible Charges
PC 1001.95 reaches almost every misdemeanor on the books. In San Francisco, the charges I see qualify regularly include:
- Petty theft and shoplifting — PC 484, PC 459.5. See the petty theft page.
- Drug possession — HS 11350, HS 11357, HS 11377. See the drug possession guide.
- Trespassing — PC 602.
- Vandalism — PC 594. See the vandalism page.
- Public intoxication — PC 647(f).
- Disturbing the peace — PC 415.
- Resisting arrest — PC 148.
- Simple battery, simple assault — PC 242, PC 240 (non-DV).
- Brandishing — PC 417.
- Criminal threats charged as a misdemeanor — PC 422.
- Solicitation — PC 647(b).
- Hit and run with property damage only — VC 20002.
If the charge is a misdemeanor and not on the carve-out list below, the door is open.
Who Doesn't — The Carve-Outs
Three categories of misdemeanor are statutorily excluded:
1. Domestic violence offenses.
PC 273.5, PC 243(e)(1), and any charge fitting the domestic-violence definition under Family Code 6211. The legislature deliberately excluded these in the original drafting. DV cases require a different strategy — PC 1001.36 mental health diversion can sometimes apply, plea-down to a non-DV offense like PC 415 is often the better target.
2. PC 290-registerable offenses.
Anything that, on conviction, would require the defendant to register as a sex offender. The exclusion is absolute.
3. DUI — under VC 23640.
Vehicle Code 23640 bars diversion for DUI. The only DUI-eligible diversion in California is PC 1001.80 Military Diversion — for active-duty servicemembers, reservists, and veterans whose offense stems from service-connected mental health, PTSD, TBI, MST, or substance abuse. See the DUI defense page.
The Four Diversion Tracks San Francisco Uses
PC 1001.95 does not stand alone. San Francisco runs four parallel diversion tracks. The right track depends on the charge, the defendant's background, and the circumstances of the offense.
PC 1001.95 — Misdemeanor Judicial Diversion
The default track. Broad. Available for most misdemeanors. No guilty plea required. Up to 24 months. Carve-outs above.
PC 1001.36 — Mental Health Diversion (MHD)
For defendants whose qualifying mental-health diagnosis — PTSD, bipolar, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, others — was a significant factor in the offense. Available for misdemeanors and many felonies. Requires a clinical evaluation and a treatment plan. Up to 24 months. If your charge is on the 1001.95 carve-out list — including domestic violence — MHD may still be possible in your case. You need to talk with an attorney to determine if it can apply.
PC 1001.80 — Military Diversion
For active-duty servicemembers, reservists, and veterans whose offense is connected to service-related mental-health conditions or substance abuse. The only diversion track that reaches DUI. Up to 24 months. Successful completion ends in dismissal.
PC 1001.83 — Parental Caregiver Diversion (PCD)
For primary caregivers of minor children. The defendant must be the custodial parent or primary caregiver of a child under 18. Available for misdemeanors and some felonies. Two-year track. Conditions tailored to allow the defendant to continue caring for their kids.
A single case can sometimes run on more than one track. PCD plus MHD. Military plus MHD. The eligibility analysis is not always either-or.
What the Judge Weighs
PC 1001.95 directs the court to consider whether diversion would benefit the defendant and whether the public would be reasonably protected. In practice, the judge weighs four factors:
- The defendant's background. Stable employment, family ties, school enrollment, community connections — these get weight. Prior record gets weight in the other direction. A clean record makes the motion easy.
- The nature of the offense. A first-time petty theft from Walgreens reads differently than a battery on a stranger. The court reads the police report.
- The defendant's willingness to comply. The judge wants to know diversion will actually be completed. Acceptance of responsibility, treatment engagement, voluntary classes already started — all of it helps.
- Public safety. The court asks whether granting diversion creates a risk. For most first-offense misdemeanors, the answer is no.
The job of defense counsel at the diversion hearing is to put all four factors in front of the judge in a way that is concrete, documented, and human.
Conditions Are Alternatives to Jail
Most people facing a San Francisco misdemeanor are not afraid of community service.
They are afraid of jail.
A misdemeanor in California carries up to one year in county jail. For most first-offense lower-level charges, the actual sentence is far less. Sometimes none at all. But the threat is real, and it lands hard.
PC 1001.95 conditions are alternatives to incarceration. That is the entire point of the statute. The defendant does something other than sit in a jail cell. The court calls it a condition. Your lawyer calls it leverage.
The conditions are tailored to the case. An anti-theft class makes sense for theft. An anger management class makes sense for a non-DV battery. Drug education makes sense for drug possession. Community service applies broadly. Restitution comes in whenever someone suffered loss. Treatment programs come in when substance abuse or mental health is part of the picture.
Your lawyer's job is to negotiate conditions you can actually complete — and to keep jail off the table.
Two conditions apply across the board:
- No new arrests during the diversion period.
- Regular progress check-ins with the court — commonly every 90 to 180 days.
For many first-time misdemeanor defendants, the substantive conditions are completed in six months. The remainder of the diversion period is the no-new-arrest clock running out.
What Happens at the End
You complete the conditions. You appear at the final hearing. The court reviews the record. If everything is in order —
The case is dismissed. Not reduced. Not deferred. Dismissed.
The arrest can then be sealed under PC 851.91. After sealing, the arrest does not appear on most background checks.
For most employers, most landlords, most professional licensing boards, and most immigration purposes, the case ceases to exist. The few exceptions — certain federal background checks, certain firearm-related applications — should be discussed with counsel before relying on the dismissal.
When to Raise It
Raise PC 1001.95 at arraignment. Lock in the eligibility analysis. Start the paperwork.
Starting early helps two ways. The conditions clock only starts running once the court grants the motion — an earlier grant means an earlier dismissal. And the judge gets the eligibility framing in front of them at the first hearing, with time to consider it.
The defendants who walk out of San Francisco Superior Court with a 1001.95 grant in hand are usually the ones whose lawyers raised judicial diversion at or near arraignment, with the eligibility record ready to go.
Why You Need Counsel for This
PC 1001.95 looks straightforward on paper. The motion practice is not.
A successful diversion motion in San Francisco requires:
- A written motion that identifies the right statute. Confusing 1001.95 with 1001.36 in the caption gets the motion summarily denied.
- A factual record built from the police report, the rap sheet, and the defendant's life. The judge reads what defense counsel writes. Generic templates do not work.
- Negotiated conditions that the defendant can actually complete. Setting up a defendant for failure with unrealistic conditions destroys the diversion at month four.
- Active monitoring. Missed deadlines, unfiled completion certificates, late community-service paperwork — any of it terminates the diversion. Counsel keeps the calendar.
Cost
Misdemeanor diversion defense in San Francisco runs $2,500 to $7,500 depending on the charge, the defendant's history, and the complexity of the eligibility analysis.
ASH Legal handles San Francisco misdemeanor diversion on a flat fee starting at $2,800. One number. One attorney. Covers arraignment, the diversion motion, court appearances, DA negotiation, condition monitoring, completion paperwork, and the dismissal hearing. Payment plans are available. The fee is the fee.
Free 30-Minute Consultation
Tell me what you're charged with. I'll tell you which diversion track applies, whether 1001.95 is the right path, and what it would take to win it.
Schedule Free ConsultationAbout the Author
Ahmed S. Hasan
San Francisco Criminal Defense Attorney · State Bar of California #364992
Ahmed S. Hasan is the founder of ASH Legal, a solo criminal defense practice based in San Francisco. The firm runs on flat-fee representation: one lawyer, one fee, from arraignment through resolution. No hourly billing. No surprise invoices.
Ahmed is a graduate of Emory University School of Law and a member in good standing of the State Bar of California (Bar #364992). His practice focuses on San Francisco misdemeanor defense — DUI, domestic violence, petty theft and shoplifting, drug possession, vandalism, trespassing, and assault and battery — with particular attention to diversion-track outcomes that end in dismissal under PC 1001.95, PC 1001.36 (Mental Health Diversion), PC 1001.80 (Military Diversion), and PC 1001.83 (Parental Caregiver Diversion).
Ahmed previously served as a post-bar clerk with the San Francisco Public Defender's Office, the city's largest indigent-defense practice. He is a member of the Asian Pacific American Bar Association of Silicon Valley.
He represents clients at the San Francisco Hall of Justice (850 Bryant Street) and the Civic Center Courthouse. The ASH Legal office is at 15 Boardman Place, Suite 301, San Francisco, CA 94103.
Free 30-minute consultations are available by phone or Zoom. (510) 545-6515 · ahmed@ashlegal.com